First time here? Sign Up  Returning user? Log In

0
points

Tiger Woods' Nurse Files Big Lawsuit

January 21, 2011 | 02:33 PM PST

Filed under: Tiger Woods, Celebrity Court Date

Do you think the nurse fired for "looking" at Tiger Woods' medical records SHOULD have been fired?
X17 is reporting that a Florida nurse, who was fired after peaking at Tiger Woods' medical records, is now fighting back!

After the fateful November 2009 evening when Tiger crashed his SUV, trying to escape his enraged baby mama Elin who was trying to whomp on him with a golf club, he was rushed to the hospital for an exam. One curious medical professional snagged his file and gave it a looksie, exactly 3 times in 10 minutes.

Now, the murse, David M. Rothenberg has filed a $400,000 suit against Health Central for defamation saying there was no real reason for them to fire him and for him to possibly lose his medical license. He denies ever peaking at Woods' private file.
[ Source: x17 ]

Do you think the nurse fired for "looking" at Tiger Woods' medical records SHOULD have been fired?
RESULTS
YES
65%

NO
35%
COMMENTS (0)
Post a comment
POST A COMMENT
Log in to post a comment.


No account? Sign Up now!
MY 411
total # of votes: 0
Agreeability w/ majority: 0%
Your rank: none
Total number of points: 0 pts
Points redeemable for swag: 0 pts
Sign up to save your activity on WT411! Members are also eligible to redeem points for items in the Swag Shop!
THE IT LIST
1
aprildawn
229,510 pts
2
Zies
226,435 pts
3
bigBootyJenJen
224,765 pts
4
Jenydew
194,190 pts
5
timelord
172,800 pts
6
LaVane
147,070 pts
7
RDL18
122,710 pts
8
Twizter
119,465 pts
9
TheMouse
117,725 pts
10
markb
116,060 pts
Updated: May 23, 2012 12:00 AM
FOLLOW US!
Meet the Writer
If you look-up Bad @$$ Babe in the dictionary, you'll find a pic of resident blogger and gab fest fox Nikki. If you're curious where this devilish creature comes from, click here!

© 2012 SendMe, Inc. Any reproduction, publication, further distribution or transmission of materials provided at this site, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.